Análise Advocacia 2022
We are very pleased to announce the acknowledgment of Paulo Freitas Ribeiro Advogados Associados and our partner, Paulo Freitas Ribeiro, in the Most Admired 2022 ranking, prepared by Análise Editorial. The publication highlighted the specialization of the firm in criminal cases, the performance in the sectors of electricity, transportation and logistics, and its performance in […]
Paulo Freitas: Criminal Procedure and the Elections
In an article written by Paulo Freitas Ribeiro for the Fumus Boni Iuris Blog of the newspaper O Globo, our name partner discusses how police investigations, precautionary measures and crime reports are being used as political facts by the electoral campaigns of the candidates to the Presidency of the Republic. Read the full article published […]
Paulo Freitas and Julia Lavigne: Statutory organization and reduction of criminal risks for company directors
Our partners Paulo Freitas Ribeiro and Julia Lavigne discuss about the criminal risks that statutory directors of companies are exposed to and propose further accuracy of the articles of incorporation. Read the full article published in the Legal Consultant Magazine (ConJur): https://www.conjur.com.br/2022-ago-29/ribeiro-lavigne-organizacao-estatutaria-reducao-riscos-criminais
Paulo Freitas Ribeiro: The undue criminal procedure and the responsibility of the State
In an article published on the Blog Fumus Boni Iuris, from Jornal O Globo, Paulo Freitas Ribeiro reflects on the consequences for individuals of undue state action in criminal proceedings, such as those resulting from accusations without evidence. Read the full article at https://oglobo.globo.com/blogs/fumus-boni-iuris/post/2022/07/paulo-freitas-ribeiro-o-processo-penal-indevido-e-a-responsabilidade-do-estado.ghtml
Matheus Vellasco e Maria Gabrielle Presler: House search: new STJ standards and overcoming Precedent nº 70 of TJ-RJ
In an article published by the Magazine Consultor Jurídico (ConJur), Maria Gabrielle Presler and Matheus Kauss Vellasco discuss the recent jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) on the evidentiary standards for gauging the (il)lawfulness of evidence collected during police actions carried out without court order and its conflict with precedent nº 70 of […]
Paulo Freitas Ribeiro: The Pardon and Its Consequences
In an article published on the Blog Fumus Boni Iuris, from Jornal O Globo, Paulo Freitas Ribeiro discusses the consequences of the pardon granted to federal deputy Daniel Silveira on the secondary effects of the sentence imposed by the STF. Read the full article at https://oglobo.globo.com/blogs/fumus-boni-iuris/post/2022/04/paulo-freitas-ribeiro-o-indulto-e-suas-consequencias.ghtml
Chambers and Partners 2022
Paulo Freitas Ribeiro Advogados Associados and its senior partner, Paulo Freitas Ribeiro, were recognized by Chambers and Partners, at Chambers Brazil 2022, in the category Dispute Resolution: White-Collar Crime. In one of the quotes, Paulo is recognized as “a very strategic lawyer, always involved in cases of great importance”. We thank our clients and partners […]
Matheus Vellasco and Laura Becker: The case of the coach and the legal feasibility of the capitulation of attempted murder
In an article published in the Magazine Consultor Jurídico (Conjur), Matheus Vellasco and Laura Becker addressed the case of a coach from São Paulo who took dozens of people on an expedition to Serra da Mantiqueira. However, given the adverse weather conditions and the alleged leader’s lack of technical expertise as a trail guide, the […]
Leaders League 2022
We are honored with the recognition of our law firm by the Leaders League – Brazil 2022 Guide, in the White-Collar Crime category. Our partners Paulo Freitas Ribeiro and Raquel Dias were distinguished by the performance of their work. We thank our clients and partners for their trust and the team of lawyers at Paulo […]
O Globo: The Penalty in Crimes Related to Pharmaceutical Commerce
Law 9.677/98, which amended Article 273 of the Penal Code, now provides the application of the same penalty (from 10 to 15 years of jail time) to very different severe situations in the context of the commerce of medicines and the like. As a result, the Judiciary began to apply, by analogy, the penalty provided […]